Blawgosphere Roundup

Here it is: this week’s best of the blawgosphere (or at least the best of what I read):

  • Eric Turkewitz strips away the hysteria and explains just how and why a four-year old can be sued for negligence in his latest post here.
  • Over at Huffington Post, Joanne Doroshow explains the cyclical fluctations in insurance premiums and how premium increases are not really driven by lawsuit costs.
  • Over at Concurring Opinions, Miriam Cherry points to some evidence suggesting that cell phone carriers are turning over cell phone records to auto insurance companies investigating crashes. (Perhaps the customer service rep Cherry spoke with simply meant that cell phone companies are producing these records if subpoenaed?).
  • He’s not a legal blogger, but I could resist tossing in this week’s quote from Boston Red Sox owner John Henry: “Medicine is not a precise science. If it were, you would never hear the phrase ‘second opinion.'” Henry evidently gets medicine, and medical malpractice lawsuits, a lot better than the people like Peter Orzag .

From Around The Legal Blogosphere

  • Professor Alberto Bernabe agrees with my assessment of the CVS inhaler situation: there would be no duty under the common law. Prof Bernabe also provides a link to some musings by Jonathan Turley about the tort defenses available to someone who forcefully took an inhaler from the pharmacy to help the woman.
  • Professor Bernabe also highlights Duke Law’s “Voices of American Law“: a great series of mini-documentaries on important recent Supreme Court cases.
  • Most joggers’ biggest roadway fears is being hit by a car. But Tom Vanderbilt highlights a recent case where a bicyclist fatally struck a jogger. This incident and others raises the question: can multi-use paths be shared safely by cyclists and runners? Or should cyclists have their own paths?

Link Roundup

  • Professor Alberto Bernabe reports on the $21 million verdict that a New Hampshire jury returned against a pharmaceutical company. The plaintiff in the case developed Stevens-Johnson Syndrome from her use of a generic nonsteroidal antiinflammatory, leaving her with burns all over her body. If you are brave and not easily nauseated, you can read more about the ravages of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome here.

Link Roundup: From Across The Blawgosphere

  • Over at Torts, law professor Alberto Bernabe covers an ethically troubling phenomenon: the outsourcing of pediatric clinical trials. More and more pediatric clinical trials are being conducted outside the United States. Nearly forty percent of pediatric clinical trials are now being carried out in developing countries. Given a recent Second Circuit decision, the outsourcing of clinical trials might not reduce the pharmaceutical companies’ legal exposure, but patients in the developing world are certainly more likely to have a tougher time getting a lawyer with the skills to successfully sue for them. Also problematic, as Bernabe points out, is the distribution of benefits from these clinical trials. Local populations are the test subjects in these clinical trials but once these expensive pharmaceutical make their way to market will they be available in poor corners of the world? [Torts].

Continue reading

Weekly Roundup Of Personal Injury News

Post-Post-Script To A Documentary

the_last_campaign_big_business.jpgSometime ago, I read a favorable review of a documentary called The Last Campaign. (I believe the review was by David Yas, the editor of Mass Lawyers Weekly, but I cannot be certain.)
The movie made its way into my Netflix queue and arrived in my mailbox this weekend. The movie depicts the 2004 re-election campaign of West Virginia Supreme Court justice Warren McGraw. In the election, McGraw, a populist opponent of big business, was defeated by his Republican opponent, the relatively unknown Brent Benjamin.
Despite being a popular incumbent, McGraw found himself the underdog when Don Blankenship, the CEO of Massey Coal, poured millions of dollars into the election to run ads against McGraw. McGraw suffered a defeat in the election and Massey Coal succeeded in installing a justice – Brent Benjamin – whom many alleged the company had bought – on the court, right before an appeal was heard in a $50 million lawsuit against it.
Over objections that he should recuse himself from the case because of a conflict of interest, Benjamin went on to cast the deciding vote in a West Virginia Supreme Court opinion that overturned the $50 million dollar verdict against Massey Coal.
The movie does not allude to it, since it was released in 2005, but the story has a post-script: Massey Coal’s influence in the election of Justice Benjamin wound up before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. In that case, the Supreme Court held that the “probability of bias” by Justice Benjamin was so great that he should have recused himself and that, therefore, the decision by the West Virginia Supreme Court was invalid under the Due Process clause.
This week, a further post-script to The Last Campaign: the coal mine disaster in West Virginia occurred at a Massey-owned coal mine. Just another reason to be glad you live in Massachusetts.

Surprising Statistic: In 2008 More Marines Died In Motorcycle Accidents Than In Iraq

I recently came across this statistic: in 2008 more US Marines died in motorcycle accidents than died in Iraq. The actual numbers: twenty-five Marines died in motorcycle accidents in 2008, twenty-two Marines were killed in Operation Iraqi Freedom.
In response, the Marine Corps has produced “Semper Ride,” a motorcycle safety film. The film features many top bikers and motocross figures, including Ben Bronstom, Chris “Teach” McNeil and Josh Herrin.
The film makes many sensible points, including that no matter how good a rider you are, you can be the victim of a serious motorcycle accident if a car driver is careless even for a second. Also, if you’re a beginning rider, dirt biking is good training for learning to handle a motorcycle.
Upon reflection, the stats about Marines’ motorcycle accidents should not be so surprising. When the war in Iraq was at its height, car safety advocates were pointing out that the number of lives claimed by our nation’s roads annually – approximately 42,000 – dwarves the number of lives lost in Iraq. The only surprising thing is that even among a cohort like the Marines, who face so many dangers, motorcycle accidents are a serious risk.
Sadly, the lives lost in auto and motorcycle accidents are often easily preventable deaths. So buckle up and keep an eye out for the Marine, or other motorcyclist, who might be in traffic with you.

Continue reading

Wage & Hour Violations Face Mandatory Treble Damages

Wage and hour violations will be taken seriously in Massachusetts. Bill S.1059 proposed that treble damages must be awarded to plaintiffs who prevail in wage and hour lawsuits. On April 14, 2008, the bill was enacted into law. The new law essentially reverses the Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Wiedmann v. The Bradford Group, Inc., which held that treble damages should only be awarded where the employer’s conduct was “outrageous, because of [its] evil motive or [its] reckless indifference to the rights of others.”

S.1059’s enactment followed an interesting course. The Massachusetts Legislature initially submitted the bill to Governor Deval Patrick in February 2008. Governor Patrick returned the bill without signature and urged that certain exceptions be provided, which the Legislature rejected. Governor Patrick ultimately declined to veto S.1059.

The new law states that employees who prevail in court “shall be awarded triple damages, as liquidated damages, for any loss of wages and other benefits.” The treble damages provision applies to a host of wage and hour violations:

Payment of wages, including commissions and vacation pay
Overtime pay for nonexempt employees
Minimum wages
Improper deductions
Misclassification of employees as independent contractors
Tip pool sharing
Retaliation for asserting wage complaints

To read more about mandatory treble damages in Massachusetts, please visit Forbes’ article entitled, Massachusetts Passes Bill Restoring Triple Damages for Non-Payment of Wages.

Race Discrimination Class Action Against New York City Settles for $21 million

Employment discrimination cases do not resolve themselves overnight. In 1999, twenty employees of the City’s Department of Parks and Recreation filed complaints with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging discrimination on the basis of race and national origin in both hiring practices and promotion decisions. After approximately nine years of litigation, New York City has agreed to pay more than $21 million to settle what has grown to become a class-action lawsuit on behalf of 3,500 former and current workers.

Beginning in December 2006, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund helped coordinate the effort to reach a settlement with the City. Theodore M. Shaw, of the Legal Defense and Educational Fund, had this to say:

Today’s settlement is a clear victory for those who were denied equality in the workplace for so long. L.D.F. commends the black and Latino workers of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation who stood up to this injustice and had the courage to fight for change.

In reaching such a successful result, the plaintiff’s relied on well-known economist, Dr. Stephen A. Schneider of Nathan Associates, Inc., who testified as an expert witness on the issue of liability and damages.

To read more about the settlement, visit the New York Times article entitled, City Settles Parks Bias Suit for $21 Million.